turrior vs LinkedIn: hiring without paying for InMail, seats, or recycled profiles
LinkedIn Recruiter costs hundreds per seat per month, and outreach tools spam candidates who never reply. turrior brings you video applicants who actually want the job — for $1 per screening.
LinkedIn is where the resumes live, so it feels like where hiring should happen. In practice, hiring on LinkedIn means one of two things: paying for Recruiter seats and InMail credits to message people who mostly ignore you, or buying an AI outreach tool that automates the ignoring at scale.
The real cost of LinkedIn hiring
- Recruiter Lite or corporate seats: hundreds of dollars per month, per seat
- InMail response rates that keep falling as candidates get spammed
- AI outreach tools that put your account (and brand) at risk
- A profile is still just a resume — written by the candidate, unverified
The agentic alternative
turrior flips the direction. Instead of chasing passive candidates with cold messages, the AI agent posts your role across 200+ job boards where active applicants already are, then interviews each one on video. The people in your review queue applied on purpose — and proved it by recording real answers.
- No seats, no InMail credits, no subscription: $1 per completed screening
- Applicants come to you — no cold outreach, no spam reputation
- Every profile is backed by a video you can actually judge
- Full control: you review everyone, reject or invite with one click
Outbound vs inbound intent
The deepest difference is intent. A passive candidate answering your third InMail is doing you a favor. An applicant who recorded a video interview wants the job. That gap shows up later — in offer acceptance, in retention, in how fast they ramp.
“Every applicant arrived already screened on video. My shortlist took twenty minutes instead of two weeks.”
